RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00791
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her HOR reflects Maryland and it should reflect San Antonio, 
Texas.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the United States Air Force on 1 Oct 
09.  


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The AFPC Enlisted Accessions Branch 
confirmed that the applicant initialed DD Form 4/1, 
Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United 
States, dated 30 Mar 09 which lists her home of record in 
Maryland.

The DD Form 4 is the source document for HOR and Place of Entry 
(POE).  The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), volume 1, 
Appendix A1, part 1, states, “The place recorded as the home of 
the individual when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted 
remains the same as that recorded when commissioned, appointed, 
enlisted or inducted, or ordered into the tour of active duty, 
unless there is a break in service of more than one full day. 
Only if a break in service exceeds one full day, may the member 
change the HOR.”  The HOR is the location identified by the 
individual upon entering the service, not a location where the 
individual is later assigned or a location selected for 
convenience; a correction must be fully justified.  Domicile or 
legal residence may change, but the HOR will not.     

The complete DPSIP evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 15 May 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00791 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Feb 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIP, dated 18 Mar 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 May 14.